Teяa253
No life Poster
I am amazing. I know.
Posts: 70,114
|
Post by Teяa253 on Jun 19, 2008 0:34:29 GMT 1
I personally am not too fond of additional bending... as for the two GMs, that might get a little hectic... I'd go against it personally... ~Mai~
|
|
daxx32
Skilled earthbender
Posts: 694
|
Post by daxx32 on Jun 19, 2008 0:36:21 GMT 1
Fine by me but what do you suggest for it then?
I support addition bending nevertheless.
|
|
ZIE
Master firebender
ONOEZ!!!!
Posts: 1,983
|
Post by ZIE on Jun 19, 2008 0:37:27 GMT 1
i think if we where doing different bending things, the 2 gms should make a decision together about if it's ok. we need at least one more nominee
|
|
|
Post by arashiswind901 on Jun 19, 2008 0:37:35 GMT 1
How about.... Mind bending??? O.o
|
|
daxx32
Skilled earthbender
Posts: 694
|
Post by daxx32 on Jun 19, 2008 0:38:27 GMT 1
Won't agree with that. Too overpowered I'll allow addition bending but it must be reasonable
|
|
ZIE
Master firebender
ONOEZ!!!!
Posts: 1,983
|
Post by ZIE on Jun 19, 2008 0:38:40 GMT 1
too over powered in my opinion
|
|
Teяa253
No life Poster
I am amazing. I know.
Posts: 70,114
|
Post by Teяa253 on Jun 19, 2008 0:38:56 GMT 1
Fine by me but what do you suggest for it then? I support addition bending nevertheless. 1 GM over all... just like in times past... and I still don't like the additional bending... it makes characters seem too much likc Mary Sues to me... ~Sanaki~
|
|
|
Post by arashiswind901 on Jun 19, 2008 0:39:07 GMT 1
I accually think we should just stick with the regular bending types, just make it a free rpg... like allowing people to wander around... group with whoever, and stuff like that......
|
|
daxx32
Skilled earthbender
Posts: 694
|
Post by daxx32 on Jun 19, 2008 0:39:27 GMT 1
i think if we where doing different bending things, the 2 gms should make a decision together about if it's ok. we need at least one more nominee Agreed the 2 GMs will approve thoroughly on reading the bendings and fixing if it's too overpowered.
|
|
ZIE
Master firebender
ONOEZ!!!!
Posts: 1,983
|
Post by ZIE on Jun 19, 2008 0:40:47 GMT 1
Tera i think you might get outvoted about the GM's. explain why it would be hectic please? aditional bending would have to be aproved by the gm(s). this would probably prevent some of the mary sues.
|
|
daxx32
Skilled earthbender
Posts: 694
|
Post by daxx32 on Jun 19, 2008 0:40:52 GMT 1
I accually think we should just stick with the regular bending types, just make it a free rpg... like allowing people to wander around... group with whoever, and stuff like that...... Doing that will take time since we have to clean out the forums and start out with locations, battle arena, and other stuff which will take a lot of time to contruct. Good Idea tho it will take time. Also to adding to that people will think they can just go wherever without no reason. If we are going to have that we need control which will require lots of GM we don't have that many people on here.
|
|
|
Post by arashiswind901 on Jun 19, 2008 0:41:16 GMT 1
I would like to rp though... so what or where would we do it? Because after all, I am a noob to the forum >.>
|
|
ZIE
Master firebender
ONOEZ!!!!
Posts: 1,983
|
Post by ZIE on Jun 19, 2008 0:41:50 GMT 1
we tried free rp's. its so confusing its not worth it in my oppinion.
|
|
Teяa253
No life Poster
I am amazing. I know.
Posts: 70,114
|
Post by Teяa253 on Jun 19, 2008 0:42:04 GMT 1
well, if Bee's too confused to play, and it's just us three, then we'll have 2 chiefs and 1 indian. not a very good idea in my opinion. ~Sanaki~
|
|
|
Post by arashiswind901 on Jun 19, 2008 0:42:39 GMT 1
This whole thing is confusing if you ask me....
|
|